This working paper written by Alice Nováková, Karim Kamel, and Elin Bergner argues that integrating Feminist Foreign Policy (FFP) into nuclear risk reduction (NRR) can shift security frameworks from deterrence and coercion to cooperation and human-centered approaches. While NRR focuses on technical safeguards, FFP adds value by addressing systemic inequalities and emphasizing empathy, justice, and inclusion. The paper critiques the gendered and colonial roots of nuclear discourse and highlights practical examples, such as the Stockholm Initiative and Global South treaties. It cautions against superficial feminist branding and calls for centering marginalized voices. The authors offer policy recommendations to create a more inclusive and transformative path toward nuclear disarmament.

This article from Dr. Rob Geist Pinfold examines Israel’s intelligence failures and successes in its ongoing conflict with Hamas. It distinguishes between occasional (intelligence assessments) and causal factors (structural and political inputs). Critically, it illustrates that Israel’s intelligence agencies deferred to the prevailing, but incorrect, assumptions and short-sighted policy priorities set by the Prime Minister’s Office. The authors also explore the over-reliance on technical intelligence, the lack of structural reform and the militarised nature of Israel’s intelligence cycle.

What happens when both the U.S. and Israel shift from preserving stability to pushing for bold change? This study explores how recent conflicts, especially the 2023 Hamas attacks, have transformed Israel into a more aggressive actor and aligned it even closer with the U.S., now under another Trump presidency. As Israel and America embrace a shared revisionist agenda, their partnership could drive major shifts in the Middle East’s balance of power.

How do Russians really feel about using nuclear weapons after the invasion of Ukraine? Despite constant threats from the Kremlin and rising global tensions, support for a nuclear strike against NATO has barely shifted. This study uncovers why public opinion has stayed so stable.

Představujeme úvodní studii zaměřenou na téma financování české obrany, jejímž cílem je zdůraznit potřebu výrazného navýšení výdajů a navrhnout možné způsoby jejich financování. Studie se snaží identifikovat klíčové otázky, které by měly být součástí veřejné debaty, a nabízí odpovědi na zásadní témata týkající se současného stavu obranného rozpočtu, jeho struktury a potenciálních zdrojů dalšího financování.

Our newest study finds that geographic proximity significantly influences public support for aiding friendly nations under attack. Using survey experiments in Japan and Czechia, they show that people are more likely to support military and non-military interventions when the conflict is perceived as nearby. While Japanese respondents strongly supported aid to Taiwan, Czech support declined for distant crises. The study highlights that perceived distance—not just actual geography—shapes public opinion, with important implications for international alliances and crisis response planning.

We are excited to invite you to a lecture from Stephen Brooks (Dartmouth College) on the topic “Command of Commerce: America’s Enduring Economic Power Advantage Over China”. The lecture will take place on April 14th 12:30 in the Jinonice building (room B330). There are no registrations.

A new study by Dr. Rob Geist Pinfold, Clive Jones, and Anoushiravan Ehteshami, published in Global Policy, examines how Iran and Israel’s long-standing rivalry has driven the Middle East toward an increasingly dangerous cycle of escalation. The research reveals a surprising role reversal: Israel, traditionally a status quo power, has become the region’s leading revisionist force, seeking to reshape the regional order after the October 7 attacks, while Iran is now on the defensive, aiming to preserve its diminishing influence.